Look, I’m a
Trekkie, I have been and ever shall be a Trekkie (Trekkies will see what I did
there). I’m not a Trekker. What’s the difference, you ask? Well, there are a
lot of definitions, but mine is this: a Trekkie is a light hearted diehard fan
who enjoys the ‘Star Trek’ franchise for what it is; good solid entertainment.
A Trekker is the kind of fan who questions everything about the franchise, such
as going to conventions and instead of thanking the actors who have appeared in
the shows over the years, they question why in certain episodes the said actor
pressed a certain button on a certain computer panel. You see the difference?
Good! Where am I going with this you ask? Well, bear with me for a little while
longer …
These days it’s
Chic to be Geek, and I’m a Geek. Although I have never had sand kicked in my
face (I’d like to see someone try), I have had to put up with the usual crap
that comes with being a Geek. Until now; the current upturn for sci-fi demands
that Hollywood make things cooler. And they don’t get cooler than J J Abrams’s ‘Star
Trek’ films. The first one not only established new actors in old familiar
roles, but also showed us how these characters came to be. We had Kirk, Spock
and McCoy all enrol in to Starfleet Academy. We see how they became the great
heroes we admire and love. We see the U.S.S. Enterprise on her maiden voyage,
already knowing that this ship and crew will be best and brightest of the
United Federation of Planets.
So now we’ve got the first film out of the way, it’s time for the sequel! And this film is so much bigger than the first! IT IS HUGE! But does it make it better? Short answer: Yes… Long answer: No… Confused?... Yes?... So was I, until I sat down to write this review. You see, there are certain events that I can’t discuss without revealing spoilers. So it’s really hard to say where the problems lie. So to explain how, let me take you back to 1982; the film is ‘Star Trek II: The Wrath of Khan’. This film is arguably the best of the original Trek films. The crew of the Enterprise is pitted against the villainous Khan played deliciously by Ricardo Montalbán. In the penultimate scene, Spock sacrifices his life to save the Enterprise from certain doom (anyone who says spoilers about a 1982 film, I have my phaser set to stun). While Spock lies dying Kirk is told to hurry down to engineering to see his fallen comrade. The emotion of this scene is raw and beautiful; it’s hard not to shed a tear, Kirk and Spock brothers in arms unable to touch through a glass wall, Kirk unable to save his best friend from the radiation that runs through Spock’s body. I defy anyone to say that this scene was not a fantastic moment in Trek history!
Fast forward to
2013 and ‘Star Trek: Into Darkness’. This film, as great as it is with its
fantastic special effects and gripping story line, lacks the emotional depth,
or soul as my better half put it. So whose fault is it? Well … it’s certainly
not J J Abrams’ and it’s undoubtedly not the actors - Chris Pine and Zachary Quinto excel as Kirk
and Spock, as do the rest of the cast. Having said that, the rest of the cast
are used sparingly and most of the time it’s just for comic relief, especially
McCoy who in the original Trek films was the emotional counterpart to Spock’s logic.
I can’t help thinking that downplaying McCoy as they did was a very bad
decision, seeing as Karl Urban’s McCoy was by far my favourite character in the
previous film. The antagonist of the piece is played by Benedict Cumberbatch of
Sherlock fame, who in my eyes is a fantastic actor but seems to be very two
dimensional in a three dimensional movie.
But I think the fault lies with the writers, it seems they started well but couldn’t be bothered to finish the story properly! It lacks originality, which is truly a shame. If they had taken the time to be more unique, this film would have seriously been off the chart! This brings me back to Trekkies vs Trekkers, if you are truly a Trekkie or have no Trek knowledge whatsoever you will love this movie. But if you are a Trekker, well ... don’t say I didn’t tell you so!
So what’s next for the crew of the Enterprise? Abrams is off to do another ‘Star’ movie, but it’s of the ‘Wars’ and not the ‘Trek’. Will he return to the franchise? Who knows? But if he does I will be there to welcome him with open arms.
4 comments:
informative. agree with a lot of the points made there.
Sounds like I'm gonna have a blast tonite...but not 'soul'...that doesnt sound good, but anyways, I'm pumped. As you mentioned in the review, this one looks like it's going to be HUGE in terms of scope and epicness. Looking forward to it!
I saw it this afternoon and, quite frankly, I loved it. I didn't find it lacking in emotional depth; on the contrary, I had tears in my eyes at least twice. I find Star Trek Into Darkness and its predecessor to be among the most emotionally engaging of any of the summer blockbusters of the last decade.
Ok been a while! Meant to get back to you before... But now the film's been out for a couple of years. Compare it to Wrath of Khan which is the better movie?
Post a Comment