There were two criticisms of ‘The Look of Love’ that
followed me into the cinema like a couple of Chihuahuas snapping at my ankles.
The first was that Steve Coogan’s central performance was little more than
Steve Coogan plays Alan Partridge playing Paul Raymond; the second was that the
film lacks a moral centre.
Both are accurate. Both are kind of the point.
‘The Look of Love’ – an examination of the life of
British porn baron Paul Raymond, from his money-spinning property deals to his
notoriety as owner of “revue bars” (i.e. strip clubs) and publisher of
top-shelf magazine ‘Men Only’ – is so effective in its evocative of the grim
seediness of Soho in the 1970s and 1980s (the principle decades in which the
film is set) that the comic baggage Coogan will always be fated to bring to any
role is a positive relief. His arch delivery of much of his dialogue sees him
firmly in on the act. Having said that, a knowing directorial decision to play
on his established persona should not detract from the due acknowledgement:
this is Coogan’s best outing as an actor thus far.
The facts of Raymond’s life (as espoused by the film)
boil down to a simple series of events: Raymond makes some serious money as a
property baron, fancies himself as an impresario, opens a member’s only
nightclub featuring exotic dancers, makes a shitload more money, drives his
choreographer wife Jean (Anna Friel) away with all his philandering, takes up
with soft porn starlet Fiona Richmond (Tamsin Egerton), and invests financially
and emotionally in his daughter Debbie (Imogen Poots) as his corporate successor,
only for her to go off the rails in spectacularly self-destructive style.
It’s referenced on at least four occasions in Matt
Greenhalgh’s screenplay that Paul Raymond was born Jeffrey Quinn. That he
reinvented himself on arrival in London as a young man, shedding his
Liverpudlian background, is a snippet of backstory that Raymond delivers as well-rehearsed
press-conference banter in two scenes set years apart. The inference is that ‘Paul
Raymond’ was an elaborate façade that Jeffrey Quinn disappeared into. It’s a
reading born out by a despairingly revealing sequence where his son from an
early, previously unmentioned marriage, turns up at Raymond’s vulgarly
over-designed penthouse and tries to learn something about the father he’s
never known. Raymond gives him a slap up meal, breaks open some good champagne,
and can’t wait to show him the door.
Coogan’s performance gives us Paul Raymond as,
variously, a little-boy-lost charmer who (it would seem) invested his property
millions in shows and wank mags purely to meet girls; a raconteur who throws
out erudite conversational snippets and self-deprecating one-liners and
effortlessly manipulates his associates into doing his bidding; and a man who,
for all that he indulges his daughter to the max and dotes on his
grandchildren, has a complete moral disconnect even when his lifestyle coils
its licentious tentacles around those dearest to him. The two most shocking
scenes portray Debbie’s cocaine use. In the first, Raymond catches her using
for the first time, and his only admonition is that cheap shit bought on the
street is cut and could contain anything – “if you’re going to do this, buy the
good stuff”. In the second, Debbie announces, distraught, that she’s been
diagnosed with breast cancer. Dad and daughter do a big fat line of
commiseratory coke together.
Poots knocks it out of the stadium as Debbie Raymond.
Her winningly gauche performance of the eponymous ballad over the end credits
gives the film what small claim it has to a human element. She nails the
character’s fluctuation between intense vulnerability and fierce
competitiveness. In her scenes with Coogan, ‘The Look of Love’ has the focus of
a Jacobean tragedy: the misguided patriarch, his personal relationships
self-sabotaged, tries to justify his wanton excesses by living vicariously
through his daughter, only to broker her destruction because she is unable to
survive the very lifestyle that sustains him.
All told, ‘The Look of Love’ is downbeat and then
some. Director Michael Winterbottom makes no bones that, for all Raymond’s
protestations that he wasn’t a pornographer, ‘Men Only’ was a grubby and
unaesthetic delivery system for gynaecologically blunt images of women. Two
‘Men Only’ photoshoots are depicted and, for all the T&A on display, they’re
utterly unerotic. Same goes for the handful of sex scenes, bodies stacked up
against each other like marble slabs.
In scene after scene, Raymond tries to convince people
he’s living the dream. He name-drops; he parades his nubile girlfriends and the
gadgets that litter his apartment; he laps it up when someone likens his
penthouse to a set from a Bond film. He goes everywhere by Rolls Royce. He
employs a chauffeur. And in scene after scene, Winterbottom takes a scalpel to
his lifestyle: cuts through the pretence and the egomania and the
self-delusion; hacks away at the absurdities – some of them pathetically funny,
others just plain sad – of what a man becomes when he lets money define him.
Hence the necessity of Steve Coogan and the Alan
Partridge persona. It takes a comedian to make all of this palatable. And it
takes a comedian to give us, with just the right degree of pathos, the tears of
a clown as the curtain falls.
No comments:
Post a Comment