On 13th November 2007, I posted my first article on The Agitation of the Mind. I acknowledged Werner Herzog as one of my favourite filmmakers and ’fessed up that I’d stolen the name of the blog from him. There followed, through the remainder of that month, a short Herzog season.
Five years and approximately 1,100 posts later, we’re firmly entrenched in this year’s Winter of Discontent and trawling through all things sick and twisted. I guess it’s like they say: it ain’t what you do, it’s what it does to you.
Anyway, to celebrate Agitation’s fifth anniversary, I’m rehashing a little gimmick I used back in April on the occasion of my fortieth birthday when I selected forty DVDs from the collection and took a screengrab at the fortieth minute. Here, I’ve hit pause and taken the screengrab at thirteen minutes and eleven seconds; and just to make it even more gimmicky, there are twenty four films: thirteen I’ve already reviewed on these pages, and eleven I haven’t … yet.
Tuesday, November 13, 2012
Monday, November 12, 2012
WINTER OF DISCONTENT: Bride of Chucky
Poor old Jesse (Nick Stabile). All he wants to do is skip town with his poor-little-rich-girl sweetheart Jade (Katherine Heigl) and leave behind his trailer park roots. Hell, he’s so hung up on the girl that he even turns down the buxom charms of white trash cougar Tiffany (Jennifer Tilly). But there are obstacles. The chief one being Jade’s uncle and legal guardian Warren Kincaid (John Ritter). And chief is the operative word. The dude’s chief of police. Obstacles two and three are: Norton (Michael Louis Johnson), Kincaid’s deputy who’s been assigned ongoing hassle Jesse duties; and Jesse’s total lack of funds.
Still, Tiffany’s not so miffed at Jesse’s rejection that she can’t offer him $1,000 to drive a couple of dolls from her oddball collection across country, and Jesse eagerly seizes upon the opportunity, finally convincing Jade to run away with him. Only, whaddaya know, there’s another obstacle. See, Tiffany’s been electrocuted in the bath by this point and her soul has transferred into a squat, ugly talking bride doll …
It should come as no surprise between the title and the synopsis above that Tiffany happens to be the former consort of one Charles Lee Ray, a gentleman of psychotic temperament who similarly found his essence trapped in the limited physicality of a plastic doll in Tom Holland’s
The ‘Child’s Play’ franchise limped along for three instalments, winding up with no small degree of contrivance at a military academy, before it received a thorough (and thoroughly unjustified) castigation at the hands of the British press after the gut-wrenchingly horrible killing, in 1993, of two-year-old James Bulger by two boys who were only ten years of age themselves. Just as the tabloids led a witch-hunt against ‘First Blood’ after the Hungerford massacre six years earlier – without any real evidence – so ‘Child’s Play 3’ bore the brunt of tabloid proselytizing and calls for it to be banned.
The seven-year hiatus between ‘Child’s Play 3’ and the revival of the saga with ‘Bride of Chucky’ speaks for itself. Ditto the jettisoning of the ‘Child’s Play’ brand the elevation of Chucky’s name to title-card identifier.
Oh, and there’s also the matter of writer Don Mancini (who has had a creative hand in all the Chucky films to date) re-imagining the whole thing as outright comedy. Sure, Chucky had dealt in pithy one-liners – what stalk ‘n’ slash anti-hero debuting in the 80s didn’t? – but the first three opuses were generally played straight.
Mancini and director Ronnie Yu did us all a favour conceiving of ‘Bride of Chucky’ as a delivery system for bad taste laughs. And they played a blinder in casting Jennifer Tilly. Although Tiffany is consigned to the bride doll’s body less than a third of the way into the film and her performance – like Brad Dourif’s as Chucky – is thereafter voice-over work, her live action turn for those first twenty five minutes is a showstopper. And even afterwards, her verbal sparring with Dourif is priceless.
Stabile and Heigl, however, are bland. Fortunately, Ritter and Johnson as their badge-and-gun wearing nemeses are suitably hissable. Chucky’s targeting of Chief Kincaid gives the film is best visual pun, an homage to 80s horror that is foreshadowed in an enjoyably over-egged evidence room theft sequence early in the film which tips its hat to Jason, Michael and Freddy.
The popularity of ‘Bride of Chucky’ led – inevitably, given the icky final reel hint as to the direction a follow-up might take – to a fifth outing, a few years later: ‘Seed of Chucky’. Then it was all quiet on the killer doll front for almost a decade. But the sneeringly murderous li’l fella’s back next year, though early word suggests (unpromisingly) that it’ll be a DTV release, in ‘Curse of Chucky’. “Chucky’s so Eighties,” someone scornfully, and unwisely, observes after clapping eyes on the doll. That’s as maybe, and his filmography is intermittent at best, but with the Chuckmeister about to embrace his fourth decade as a bona fide genre icon there’s no doubting his durability.
Saturday, November 10, 2012
WINTER OF DISCONTENT: The Loreley’s Grasp
Wotan … Lorelei … the sirens … the Rhein-gold … the treasure of the Nibelungen. Don’t worry if you’re not familiar with Richard Wagner’s epic cycle of four operas – neither are the makers of ‘The Loreley’s Grasp’. They can’t even spell “Lorelei” properly, FFS.
We open with a woman shooing off her husband-to-be the night before their nuptials, reminding him that it’s bad luck to the see the bride before their wedding. Bad luck for her in this case. A scaly creature in a black robe comes crashing through her window, inflicts some heavy lacerations and tears her heart out.
The townsfolk are gripped by superstitious fear, particularly a blind Hungarian violinist (I’m not making this up) who babbles to anyone who will listen about the legend of the Lorelei. Elke Ackerman (Silvia Tortosa), a tutor at a nearby girls’ academy, petitions the mayor (Luis Induni) to provide protection for her charges.
Local huntsman Sigurd (Tony Kendall) offers his services. Quite what he’d find to hunt along the banks of the Rhein is left unexplained, but when he turns up at the academy on his motorbike with a rifle slung casually over his shoulder he certainly looks the part. The academy, by the way, seems to have just one subject on the curriculum: pool parties.
The girls take a fancy to Sigurd and some early scenes suggest rivalry for his affections and his distraction by their nubile charms … but director Amando de Ossorio doesn’t go anywhere with it. Then we seem to be going down the route of fractious-relationship-thawing-to-romance between Sigurd and Elke … only for de Ossorio to completely sideline this aspect until the final reel when he needs to pile on the motivation for Elke’s ludicrously contrived woman-in-peril sequence.
The mid section consists of: Sigurd being a little too late in responding while various subsidiary characters are slashed by a scaly claw prior to organ removal; Sigurd receiving screeds of exposition from a professor (Angel Menendez) who performs arcane experiments and quite randomly keeps a sheep in his lab …
… and Sigurd becoming infatuated by a mysterious flame-haired woman (Helga Line) who only ever seems to appear near bodies of water and is carried away from him, just seconds before any hanky-panky can occur, by a manservant clad in archaic garb who wades into the Rhein with her. Failing to connect this odd behaviour with the ramblings of the violinist and the scaly appearance of the beast, Sigurd and Elke puzzle over the enigma:
Sigurd: All its traces were lost in the water.
Elke: Can it be something aquatic?
Sigurd: It’s possible.
No shit, Sherlock!
Eventually, our copper-topped temptress introduces herself as Lorelei and even king of the fuckin’ dimwits Sigurd realises that something is rotten in the state of Denmark. Or rather, someone is immortal in the hall of the Nibelungen.
The penny having dropped, it’s a race against time to end the Lorelei’s reign of terror. (Incidentally, for anyone who’s narked at me for not hoisting the jolly spoiler alert, ‘The Loreley’s Grasp’ tips you off about four minutes into its running time. Believe me, there’s nothing to spoil.) While the mayor uses all of his diplomacy to talk down a torch-bearing mob hellbent on getting themselves killed hunting the Lorelei by moonlight …
… Sigurd tangles with manservant Alberic (Luis Barboo), is mesmerised by Lorelei herself and only manages to escape thanks to resentment between the sirens. A word about the sirens: in legend, these are the fabled mer-women who are so beautiful and beguiling that sailors unthinkingly steer their craft into the rocks. In the world according to Amando de Ossorio, they’re a trio of bleached blondes in costumes more suited to a go-go bar than the epic grandeur of Teutonic legend.
De Ossorio is best known for his ‘Blind Dead’ sequence, four films that positively drip with atmosphere, the very fabric of them swirling with the misty dream-logic of folklore. ‘The Loreley’s Grasp’, his antepenultimate directorial outing, lacks any such vibe. It’s a disjointed affair, with entire scenes either truncated just as they’re beginning to develop a dynamic, or simply not revisited or referred to again. Continuity often seems to be an afterthought with one sequence in particular flitting from night to day to night in the space of about 15 seconds – I was unable to determine if this denotes the passage of a day and a half in the narrative or whether the editor had been drinking.
As an exploitationer, it’s similarly confused: De Ossorio lingers over the ripped-out-heart sequences, filming the viscera beneath the skin in gloating detail, but goes all coy when it comes to nudity. The pulchritude factor can’t be argued with, though. Helga Line in particular is a vision and her seductive Lorelei single-handedly gives the film its iconography and memorability.
Thursday, November 08, 2012
WINTER OF DISCONTENT: Night Warning
Once upon a time (i.e. the late 1960s) Mom and Pop
leave li’l Billy in the care of his aunt Cheryl (Susan Tyrrell) before heading
off on a long car journey. The kid’s screaming his head off, and with what
happens in the next 90 minutes it’s almost as if he knew what’s coming. As Mom
and Pop drive off, Cheryl turns away, obscuring Billy from view and smiling a
knowing smile. Director William Asher freeze-frames the moment. It’s the first
indication that something isn’t quite right.
We rejoin Mom and Pop far enough into their car
journey that they’re navigating a twisty mountain round. Mom’s looking at
snapshots of li’l Billy and cooing over how cute he is. Pop’s opining that he’s
missing the li’l guy already. Hands up everyone who’s already marked these mawkish
sentimentalists out as our first victims. You’re absolutely right. Pop begins
the mountain road descent, tamps the brakes and … whaddaya know? … they don’t
work. He reacts in the time-honoured tradition of characters in movies who find
their brakes non-functional: he drives faster and steers wildly.
Allow me to pause for a rant. The implication is
obvious (and is confirmed later in the movie): Cheryl wants Billy all for
herself. Therefore the brakes have been sabotaged. Therefore Cheryl must have
cut through the brake lines before her sister and
brother-in-law left. So, rant the first: are we honestly supposed to believe
that Mom and Pop have travelled far enough to arrive at a fucking
mountain pass without once having to use the brakes? No stop signs,
no intersections, no requirement to slow down because of volume of traffic or
someone pulling out in front of them? Suburban house to mountain pass without
ever needing to brake?
Allow me to indulge in another rant. Why do characters
in movies who discover they’ve got no brakes always respond
by mashing the accelerator pedal to the floor and jerking the steering wheel
side to side? Why not, y’know, pop the motherfucker in neutral and yank the
handbrake? Sure, you’re going to knacker the sychromesh, you’re looking at an
insurance write-off and you’re probably going to suffer a little whiplash into
the bargain, but – hey! – the chances of survival are infinitely better.
However, back to Mom and Pop on their own personal
highway to hell, and Pop decides to go with the drive faster/steer wildly
option and damned if the family saloon doesn’t go into the back of a logging
truck with ten foot of tree-trunk overhanging. Said lumber goes through the
windscreen and pulverises Pop. Mom gets hers when what’s left of the saloon
goes over a cliff and plunges into a river whereby it explodes. Cars generally
explode if an impact triggers a detonation of the fuel tank. This particular
car has already been submerged in water.
So, I’m five minutes into ‘Night Warning’ – also known as ‘Butcher, Baker, Nightmare Maker’, just plain ‘Nightmare Maker’ and ‘The Evil Protégé’, none of which have a lot of bearing on the film itself – and nearly 500 words’ worth of ranting is marching through my head. Then we flip forward 14 years and it’s the early 80s. Yup; we’re in a cinematic landscape of high school, tight tee-shirts and dodgy perms. And that’s the guys. Li’l Billy is now 17-year-old Billy (Jimmy McNichol) – he’s living with aunt Cheryl, pinning his hopes on a basketball scholarship and dating wholesome girl-next-door type Julie (Julia Duffy).
So, I’m five minutes into ‘Night Warning’ – also known as ‘Butcher, Baker, Nightmare Maker’, just plain ‘Nightmare Maker’ and ‘The Evil Protégé’, none of which have a lot of bearing on the film itself – and nearly 500 words’ worth of ranting is marching through my head. Then we flip forward 14 years and it’s the early 80s. Yup; we’re in a cinematic landscape of high school, tight tee-shirts and dodgy perms. And that’s the guys. Li’l Billy is now 17-year-old Billy (Jimmy McNichol) – he’s living with aunt Cheryl, pinning his hopes on a basketball scholarship and dating wholesome girl-next-door type Julie (Julia Duffy).
Cheryl isn’t too keen on any of this. “College is for
rich kids and people with brains,” she tells him discouragingly: “you wouldn’t
fit in there.” The real trouble starts on Billy’s birthday. Having refused to
let Billy bring Julie home as his date for his birthday meal (“I’ll be your
date,” she coos ickily), Cheryl packs him off to school and stays in to await
the arrival of the TV repairman. If you think this scenario sounds like it
belongs in a cheap porno, then wait till you get a load of Cheryl’s
cringe-making seduction technique. The TV repairman declines her advances and
gets a kitchen knife in his back by way of remonstration. Billy walks in on a
scene of carnage.
Less than half an hour in the proceedings, and the
potential narrative developments are manifold: we could have Billy coerced into
corpse disposal and the movie play out in cat ‘n’ mouse as he tries to
extricate himself from Cheryl’s control while her domineering behaviour
threatens to become murderous once again; we could have Billy’s fragile
emotions lead him down a dark path where he becomes the
killer in order to safeguard his aunt from prosecution (a concept that would
justify the ‘Evil Protégé’ alternative title). Both of these options would
certainly play up to the heavily implied incest theme. Or we could go the
“Billy is imprisoned by Cheryl while Julie, suspecting something is afoot, sets
herself up for final girl duties when she decides to investigate” route. Or we
could jump forward another 14 years (although this would have made ‘Night
Warning’ essentially sci-fi) and explore the thirty-something Billy’s life as
he struggles to keep the past in the past and that skeleton of aunt Cheryl
walled up in the cellar.
Instead, Asher and his three scripters – Steve
Breimer, Alan Jay Glueckman and the wonderfully named Boon Collins – have a
couple of neighbours barge in (rant number three: why the fuck don’t movie
characters who are faced with unexpected corpse disposal requirement lock their
front doors first?), the police are called and Detective Joe Carlson (Bo
Svenson) immediately smells a rat. With Cheryl having sustained no bruising and
none of her clothes ripped, he doesn’t buy her rape attempt/self-defence story.
And with the first witnesses at the scene putting the murder weapon in Billy’s
hands, he begins to wonder what the real story is.
Ordinarily – for the slasher film is a great respecter
of stereotypes – Carlson would be the tenacious cop who, for all his instincts,
is always one step behind as the bodies pile up. Ordinarily. But not here.
Carlson is out and out obnoxious, a detective who questions suspects by
repeatedly yelling at them, calling them liars and asking impertinent questions
about their sexuality. Pace the latter, he’s a homophobe of
the highest order. And when he does some digging and discovers that the TV
repairman was gay and in a relationship with Tom Landers (Steve Eastin) –
Billy’s basketball coach – his bigotry breaks ground and creates havoc.
And it’s here, against all odds, that ‘Night Warning’
– otherwise a blandly-directed and often lazily scripted piece of work –
manages to be interesting. With its obvious genre trappings and its
ooooh-isn’t-this-controversial incest subtext, the film suddenly (if only
temporarily) side-steps overt melodrama in the form of the clearly demented
Cheryl and instead mines a squirmily unpleasant seam of social horror from
Carlson’s attitudes and behaviour.
Initially given over lambasting Billy with questions
like “It doesn’t make a whole lotta sense for a fag to be raping your aunt,
does it?”, and later shown to pull a gun on a (notably Hispanic) suspect, the
filmmakers seem to set Carlson on course to becoming the most loathsome (and
potentially dangerous) character in the movie; a character whose venality stems
not from insanity, dark secrets from the past or quasi-supernatural influences
but a social prejudice that is still depressingly prevalent. Hints of misogyny
and xenophobia shore-up Carlson’s gay-bashing mindset. And this guy carries a
gun and badge!
Carlson’s crusade against Billy and Landers –
misreading their relationship as two sides of a gay love triangle – occupies
the middle third, with Cheryl’s machinations weaving in and out of the
narrative in the background (her milk-and-cookies approach to scuppering
Billy’s basketball scholarship attempt is as malicious as it is subtle), until
everyone involved in the production suddenly seems to remember that Cheryl’s
supposed to be the villain of the piece. At which point Tyrrell – always one of
Hollywood’s more eccentric talents – ramps up her performance from wannabe milf
…
… to outright loony …
… while the screenplay piles up the final act excesses
like melodrama’s going out of style. Lurching from hidden corpse to dark
familial secrets revealed to secondary character trapped in House of Psycho to
final girl running through the woods shenanigans to despatched villain coming
back one more time to nutcase cop getting the wrong idea to an end credits
“what happened next” crawl that’s as ludicrous as it is abrupt, ‘Night Warning’
spirals off into increasingly contrived histrionics as if hellbent on holding
back an actual conclusion ... as … long … as … possible.
It’s easy to see why it ended up on the DPP’s video
nasties list in the UK in the 80s (albeit as a peripheral title rather than one
of the 39 that were actually prosecuted under the Obscene Publications Act),
but it’s so over-the-top that the only elements of the film liable to truly
offend are the atrocious sound editing (particularly in the final act thunderstorm
that seems to come and go depending on whether someone’s about to get offed)
and the demented intensity of Tyrrell’s performance.
Tuesday, November 06, 2012
WINTER OF DISCONTENT: Blind Beast
The artist and the model. The muse. The creation of the masterpiece. These elements have found their way into more than one cinematic work that has emerged as its own masterpiece. Jacques Rivette’s ‘La belle noiseuse’ springs to mind.
Yasuzo Masamura’s ‘Blind Beast’ is kind of like ‘La belle noiseuse’ only two and half hours shorter, about sculpture rather than painting, and you’d need to imagine Michel Piccoli as a sightless mother-dependent nut-job who kidnaps Emmanuelle Beart.
Okay then: ‘Blind Beast’ is actually quite different to ‘La belle noiseuse’ aesthetically. Nonetheless the artist/model relationship connection would probably make for a good double bill.
In Masamura’s film, Mako Midori plays Aki whose provocative work for a famous photographer has just been the subject of an exhibition. A nude study sculpture is also on display, and we catch our first glimpse of rival sculptor Michio (Eiji Funakoshi) in an otherwise empty gallery feeling up the statue like he’s about to reach for the Kleenex.
Later, posing as a masseur, he gains access to Aki’s apartment, uses the old handkerchief soaked in chloroform routine, and – with a little bit of help from his dear old Ma (Noriku Sengoku) – whisks her off to his studio in the middle of nowhere. It’s here that he puts a proposition to her: stick around, be his model, and she’s free to leave once he’s completed his masterwork.
There’s just one contentious point (apart, y’know, from the kidnapping): being blind, the only way he can capture Aki’s physical essence in his work is through the medium of touch. In other words, he’s decided to hold a young woman against her will so he can give her a thorough groping in the name of art. With clay-ey hands.
Initially repulsed, Aki is suspiciously quick to agree. And so begins a game of cat ‘n’ mouse complicated by the Oepidal overtones to Michio’s relationship with his mother, something Aki senses early on and is quick to exploit. In an already fucked-up movie, things take an even darker turn in the last third as Aki and Michio find themselves locked into a masochistic and mutually destructive web of passion that seems to presage Nagisa Oshima’s ‘In the Realm of the Senses’ (made seven years later).
‘Blind Beast’ is a beautifully shot if somewhat intellectually and emotionally confused movie that relies almost solely on Aki’s voiceover to denote the various stages of their unhealthy relationship. Certainly nothing else in the script, or the arc of the performances, suggests a convincing development from mind games to sexual power play to mutual dependence to flogging and biting and the non-artistic application of craft knives.
Which isn’t to say the performances are bad, although Funakoshi vacillates, often quite hilariously, between “I’ll suggest my character’s blindness by moving really slowly and waving my hands around and fuck whoever just said I look like a zombie” and “what? my character’s supposed to be blind!” Sengoku invests a one-note character with a low-key menace. Midori gives it her all, equally beguiling whether she’s being docile, coquettish, sly or seductive.
But the real star of the show is Shigeo Mano’s art design. Michio’s studio is a bizarre piece of grand guignol, a workspace assembled in the depths of the id, its walls dominated by larger-than life anatomical friezes. An eyrie of eyes on one wall, a nest of noses on another. Here an outcrop of arms, there a maze of legs. Lips that could swallow a grown man or woman if they suddenly opened. Breasts of every shape and size round out the collection. The floor space is occupied by two halves of a female nude, bosom uppermost on the first, ass in the air as regards the second.
Fifteen minutes in, and virtually every scene between Aki and Michio plays out against these images; indeed, they’re often dwarfed by these grotesque exaggerations of the female form. (Parenthetically, it’s interesting to note that Piero Schivazappa’s ‘The Frightened Woman’, in which a gynaecological bit of set design is used to unforgettable effect during a similarly masochistic sexual duel between a supposedly dominant anti-hero and an ostensibly threatened heroine, was the made the same year.)
‘Blind Beast’ is an interesting conflation of art house and exploitation which, even if it doesn’t quite hang together convincingly enough, makes unfailing use of its unique mise en scene. It’s a curio, the kind of film you just know would never get made today. They’d have to call it ‘Visually Impaired Beast’ for a start!
Sunday, November 04, 2012
WINTER OF DISCONTENT: Hitch-Hike
To hear Franco Nero, Corinne Clery and David Hess reminiscing on the special features “making of” documentary about how well they got on during filming and how proud they are of the work they produced, you’d think ‘Hitch-Hike’ was a high-point of world cinema, something worthy of comparison to Fellini or Antonioni. Actually, it’s a mean-spirited little exploitationer that was directed by Pasquale Festa Campanile.
Campanile was incredibly prolific in three disciplines: as novelist, screenwriter and director. He was apparently something of an aesthete. You wouldn’t think it to watch ‘Hitch-Hike’. Its original Italian language title is ‘Autostop Rosso Sangue’ which means exactly what you think. ‘Blood Red Autostop’ – not exactly subtle, is it?
In a film utterly devoid of likeable or sympathetic characters our ostensible protagonists are Walter and Eve Mancini (Nero and Clery), an Italian couple holidaying in America. Walter is a burned out and borderline alcoholic reporter stuck in a stagnant decade-long marriage to his boss’s daughter. Apparently affluent enough (they’re tootling round the States in a big car with an even bigger caravan behind it and doing the odd bit of hunting with a pair of expensive-looking rifles), their lifestyle seems little compensation for the fact that they can’t stand each other. Walter is boorish and verbose. He treats his wife like a piece of meat – in an early scene, he mauls her in the back of 4x4 next to the corpse of a deer he’s just bagged – and that’s when he’s not fantasizing about doing her in.
The opening credits play out over Walter tracking Eve through the cross-hairs of his rifle, only hesitating from pulling the trigger when a deer presents itself as an easier target. Eve is waspish and petulant, not averse to attracting attention from other quarters in order to score points against her husband.
After spending quarter of an hour with these two, it’s almost a relief when – against Walter’s express instructions – Eve pulls over to offer a hitch-hiker a lift. Oh, wait a minute, the hitch-hiker’s played by David Hess. Yeah, this one’s going to end badly.
Hess began his career in the music industry, first as a singer (recording ‘All Shook Up’ a year before Elvis took it to the top of the charts and scoring a middling hit with a cover version of ‘Living Doll’), then as a song-writer (random pick from the CV: Pat Boone’s ‘Speedy Gonzales’), before establishing himself as an actor as the loathsome Krug in ‘Last House on the Left’ (he also wrote the score), a persona he continued to draw upon in ‘Hitch-Hike’ and ‘The House on the Edge of the Park’. Yes, folks, we live in a world where Wes Craven and Ruggero Deodato’s go-to guy when they needed a deranged rapist once recorded a Cliff Richard cover. Personally, I’m counting that one single fact as more mind-warpingly fucked up than anything I have ever featured as part of the Winter of Discontent.
Hess’s character is called Adam, hence various references in the script – adapted from the sensitively titled novel ‘The Violence and the Fury’ by Peter Kane – to Adam and Eve. Which would imply that Walter is the serpent. Events in the last third suggest there might be something to this reading. Indeed, it’s in the last third that Campanile starts to do something really interesting with the material, having rather abruptly curtailed the Adam-terrorizes-Walter-and-Eve/will-Adam-rape-Eve-before-Walter-fights-back dynamic of the first hour. And let’s face it, said first hour trades on sexual threat and a leering objectification of its leading lady to such an extent that it would have become utterly tedious if Campanile had played his string out any longer.
‘Hitch-Hike’ delivers its best moments in the early scenes when Adam is happily playing Walter and Eve off against each other (at one point Adam, picking up on Walter’s disaffection with his job, offers him the story of a lifetime tagging along in his swathe of crime and brutality as official biographer, kind of a Beauchamp to his English Bob), and towards the end when a confluence of wounded masculinity and bad influence bring things full circle.
Challenges to Walter’s full-blooded Italian masculine imperative are rife: his marriage has devolved into a lust-hate relationship; his father-in-law is his employer, to whom his vocational ambitions are in hock; early on he breaks his fingers, necessitating a surrender of the driving duties to Eve; he gets drunk easily, suggesting an inability to hold his booze; Adam goads him into a stunningly politically incorrect debate on how gays are making the world their own (I can’t help but wonder whether the drunken dwarf’s monologue on blacks vs whites in ‘In Bruges’ owes a debt to ‘Hitch-Hike’); and ends up on the receiving end of a sadistically executed practical joke by a bunch of free-loading students.
While the scenario presents him as the ostensible hero – tested to the limits in order to prove himself – Walter is continually painted as little better than Adam. Verbosity, quick-temperedness and self-importance are traits they shared. And while the scenario presents Eve as the ostensible victim she does herself no favours, deliberately provoking Adam when commonsense ought to compel her to fade into the background. That the sexual rivalry and one-upmanship resolves in the most ambiguous rape scene this side of ‘Straw Dogs’ just adds to the general unpleasantness and moral retardation on offer.
It’d be reprehensible and worthy of immediate dismissal … but it’s just too well made.
Friday, November 02, 2012
WINTER OF DISCONTENT: Savage Streets
‘Savage Streets’ is a film so sleazy you could almost be forgiven for thinking that, instead of adding it to the rental list, it had accosted you in some trash-strewn back alley. It’d be wearing a raincoat and puffing on a foul-smelling cheroot. It would have some teeth missing and sport a lot of stubble. Its fingernails would be dirty.
“Hey, buddy,” it’d say, “you wanna see sumthin’ fucked up and nasty?”
As a devotee of the Winter of Discontent season on The Agitation of the Mind, you’d nod and aver that, yes actually, you would.
“Rape/revenge exploitationer,” it’d say, by way of introduction. “Low budget, shot on the streets.”
“Hmmm,” you’d reply, non-committal. “Sounds like it’s been done before.”
“Yeah, but it’s usually some guy who’s out to avenge his wife or girlfriend, amiright? With me, it’s this hot chick in a leather catsuit tracking down the scum who raped her sister. And wait till ya get this! The sister’s a mute – can’t scream for help when they’re putting it to her. How fucked up is that?”
You’d respond that a scenario of that description was pretty fucked up indeed. You might also cast a glance about you to determine available exit routes.
“And then these fucktard scumbags,” it’d continue, snickering a little in a manner that puts you in mind of Muttley by way of Cthulu, “chase down the hot chick’s best friend and toss her off a bridge. Right before she’s due to get married. That’s some nasty shit, right?”
Again, you’d voice agreement that said shit was most certainly of the genus nasty.
“So the hot chick gets herself a crossbow and some bear-traps and it’s fuckin’ payback time. Know what I mean? Eh?” It would cough and expectorate into the gutter at this point, then turn its attention back to you, grinning dementedly. “Hey buddy, here’s the best part. The hot chick, yeah? The one in the leather catsuit? She’s played by Linda Blair. Y’know, the chick from ‘The Exorcist’. But she’s all grown up in this one. You know what I mean, buddy?”
You’d indicate that you did indeed comprehend the insinuation. You are, after all, both men of the world. The movie would open its raincoat – you’d raise an eyebrow that it was a VHS – and give you a flash of some lurid cover art …
… and you’d be sold. Linda Blair … exploitation flick … crossbow … bear-traps. You’d hail a cab and take it home with you and hope the neighbours didn’t notice. You’d hook up the old video player again and slide it in. You’d draw the blinds and crack open a beer. An hour and a half later you’d find yourself with mixed feelings, the only unambiguous one being that you’re in dire need of a shower.
‘Savage Streets’ ticks a fuckload of exploitation boxes – rival gangs, drugs, rape, murder, switchblades, crossbows, fast cars, nudity, rock ‘n’ roll – and there’s barely a frame of it that doesn’t ooze seediness. But for every genuinely nasty scene, there’s an unintentionally hilarious one. And for every five minutes of tense cat ‘n’ mouse or vicious revenge, there’s half an hour of tedium.
Let’s break down our raincoated friend’s selling point by way of example: this is a movie where the rape of her sister and the murder of her best friend motivate teenage girl gang leader Brenda (Blair) to embark on an orgy of violence. It clocks in at 93 minutes. The rape (crassly intercut with a shower room bitch fight between Brenda and her cheerleader rival) happens about half an hour into the film. The best friend’s murder occurs just shy of the hour mark. Brenda’s vengeful rampage lasts approximately 15 minutes. Using the formula a + b / c = x, where a is the time it takes to establish Brenda’s primary motivation for revenge, b is the time it takes to establish Brenda’s tertiary motivation for revenge and c is the duration of actual catharsis, you can discover the value of x (the ratio of fast-forwarding to running time).
For those viewers disinclined to approach ‘Savage Streets’ as a maths problem, it also serves as a time capsule from an age where fashion descended into a cocaine-fuelled absence of self-consciousness and the ozone layer was irreversibly punctured by the combined output of every teenager in the western world blasting industrial quantities of hairspray over their follicles. As reprehensible a movie as it is, arguably the most disturbing facet of ‘Savage Streets’ is its parade of mullets. I kid you not. Every freakin’ character sports the kind of bouffant ’do that makes Jon Bon Jovi circa ‘Slippery When Wet’ look like a shaven-headed thug.
And speaking of time capsule, ‘Savage Streets’ also gives us Linda Blair at twenty-five playing seventeen and looking all of twelve in the scenes where she’s meant to be at her angriest and most predatory. There’s something uncomfortable about watching an actress who looks so young strutting so much cleavage. And speaking of cleavage, Linnea Quigley – who I recall as being pneumatic in such erudite fare as ‘Sorority Babes in the Slimeball Bowl-a-Rama’ and ‘Hollywood Chainsaw Hookers’ – seems positively flat-chested here.
There are entire screeds to be written on ‘Savage Streets’ – why it’s so scuzzy, why it has such longueurs, the precise nature of that interminable scene in the English Literature class, why John Vernon agreed to appear (my guess is gambling debts, although there’s always the possibility that he did it to win a dare) – but this isn’t the time. There’s a grubby VHS in a raincoat smoking on your sofa, getting ash everywhere and eyeing up your DVD of ‘Thriller – A Cruel Picture’. It knows you’ve got more beer in the fridge and it has designs on making itself at home. Spark its next stoogie, give it a can of something cheap and nasty, and kick it the hell out. Send it to chez Agitation; that sick li’l puppy’ll get a thousand words out of it.
Labels:
John Vernon,
Linda Blair,
Linnea Quigley,
Winter of Discontent
Thursday, November 01, 2012
Nun liebe kinder, gebt fein acht
The clocks have gone back, Halloween is past, there’s nothing left on the calendar but the nauseating goodwill and rampant sentimentality of Christmas. Time, then, for the Winter of Discontent, this blog’s third annual celebration of exploitation. Here’s a raised glass to filmic filth, movie malevolence, picture palace perversity, VHS venality and DVD damnation.
And before I ask forgiveness (yeah, right) for what I am about to do, here’s a more pertinent confession: Winter of Discontent 2011 wasn’t all it could have been. Illness and pressures of work meant the unfestivities got under way later than intended. Some titles I’d been promised through various sources were unforthcoming.
But not this year, oh my droogies. Preparations have been underway since summer. Some sleazy new titles have been added to the collection. The rental list has been prioritised such that I’m probably now on some MI6 watch list. And I can promise you some dark delights. There will be blood. There will be horror. There will be nudity, weaponry and profanity. The Agitation of the Mind is about to become a two month repository of the kind of movies your parents wouldn’t let you watch.
It all begins tomorrow, and the word on the street is … savage.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)































































